Any judge of the Superior Court may, upon the application of any party interested, and after notice, unless the application has been unreasonably delayed, appoint three disinterested persons to make a written appraisal of all damages due any person by reason of anything done under any provision of section 16-228 or 16-234 or which is in violation of any order made under section 16-235. Such appraisal, when approved by such judge, shall be returned to and recorded by the clerk of the superior court for the judicial district where the cause of action arose, and thereupon the sum specified therein shall be paid immediately by the company to the party entitled to the same, or the judge may order the same to be paid immediately into the hands of such clerk, to be delivered by him on demand to such party. The costs of such proceedings shall be taxed by such judge and paid by such company, and he may issue execution therefor and for such damages.

(1949 Rev., S. 5647; 1963, P.A. 349; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 127.)

History: 1963 act added “violations of orders under” Sec. 16-235 to first sentence; P.A. 78-280 substituted “judicial district” for “county”.

Section valid; taking of land is not for private purpose. 90 C. 179; 92 C. 635. Cited. 149 C. 100. Legislative history. Id., 102. Indicates legislative intent to depart from strict eminent domain principles as basis for damages and to provide for payment, to any party interested, of damages for anything done under or by authority of Sec. 16-235. Id., 104. Claim that plaintiff asking for damages under section is required first to appeal to commission from the granting of the permit is without merit; claim that phrase “anything done” under Sec. 16-235 is restricted to case where there has been a physical invasion of plaintiff's property is without merit. 152 C. 690. Whether plaintiff's application has been unreasonably delayed is an issue of fact, dependent upon the surrounding circumstances. Id., 691.