LegalFix

§ 171.34 - Standards of review.

Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

Disciplinary actions. In reviewing a final decision of the National Futures Association in a disciplinary action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association, unless the Commission finds that:

The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;

The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;

The weight of the evidence does not support the findings of the National Futures Association concerning the relevant acts or practices engaged in or omitted;

The determination that the acts or practices engaged in or omitted violated rules of the National Futures Association does not rest on a reasonable interpretation of the rules at issue;

The National Futures Association's application of its rules is not consistent with the purposes of the Act;

The National Futures Association's choice of sanction is excessive or oppressive in light of the violations found having due regard for the public interest.

Membership denial actions. In reviewing a final decision of the National Futures Association in a membership denial action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association, unless the Commission finds that:

The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;

The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;

The weight of the evidence does not support the findings made or adopted in the final decision;

The conclusion of the National Futures Association is not consistent with the purposes of the Act.

Registration actions. In reviewing a decision of the National Futures Association in a registration action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association unless the Commission finds that:

The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;

The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;

The weight of the evidence does not support the findings made or adopted in the final decision;

The conclusion of the National Futures Association is not consistent with the purposes of the Act.

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
§ 171.34 - Standards of review.